Skip to main content

Cucalorus Responses (Two Responses)

My Life as a Zucchini
The first event we went to at Cucalorus was a 10:45 am showing of My Life as a Zucchini, a French stop motion animation, which was shown in Thalian Main Theater. The theater itself was incredibly striking, with the red-velvet covered seats, antique furniture, and colorful embellishments around the stage itself, such as the cherub painting on its ceiling. It made it so that the screening was more than the film itself; it was an experience that as a result heightened the respect for the film by nature of its surroundings. If we’d walked into a barren garage filled with metal fold-up chairs, we still would have appreciated the film, but I don’t think to the complete effect would have been the same at all.
What I liked most about My Life as a Zucchini is that it is another step forward for animation as a mode for serious content, since it’s a medium that, in my experience, isn’t taken seriously at all by the general population (an animated film equals a kid film, which then, in the eyes of people I’ve encountered, completely illegitimates it). It was amazing hearing from the girls I was with (all from class, one being my roommate) how emotionally and mentally affected they were by the film and how it dealt with the topic at hand. Although they commented about the quality of the animation and laughed during comedic moments, that wasn’t all the film was boiled down to for them; it wasn’t a cheap, juvenile amusement. This adds support, I think, to my belief that animation is a medium for all ages, and has the potential to be used in the mainstream cinema to deal with more serious, philosophical topics, not just kids’ entertainment (though that is a valuable genre as well, of course!).

Tweenie Shorts: Youth
The second Cucalorus screening we went to was the Tweenie Shorts at 1:30 pm, in the Thalian Ball Room. I wasn’t entirely sure what to expect from the screening, so I was surprised by the diversity of subjects, narratives, and mediums. The varying skill levels of the submissions that Cucalorus accepted struck me (Although, granted, some were by children.). One filmmaker (Brad Lambert, Do the Scrub) made his animation in Photoshop, a relatively basic tool that is accessible to many different groups of filmmakers.
The screening location was less impactful than the Main Theater (for My Life as a Zucchini) had been, however, it was still beautiful, with the green curtains on the windows. I do think the venue (or the materials they used in it) did some damage to the showing, though, since some of the image also fell behind the screen. I think it must have been that the image at points was to big for the projection screen, but there might have been another reason I don’t know about.
Although many of the submissions were beautiful, my favorite may actually have been The Little Giraffe, by Anna Kamoroff, a 2-D animated film that follows a giraffe and hippo. Although not the most complex narrative, the film was effective, reminding me of John Lasseter’s (of Pixar Animation Studios and Disney Animation Studios) simple, but not simplistic, technique of taking any creature (or object!) and, by making them sympathetic and human in a sense, effectively creating an attachment and emotional investment in even the shortest amounts of time. By humanizing characters via basic human emotions, suddenly the audience becomes connected. At least half, if not all, of our group agreed that this was their favorite of the shorts. That wasn’t because of an incredible technical ability the filmmaker had, or an extremely complex of narrative, but because of the characterization. Although I don’t agree with the notion that the popularity contest of simple preference properly judges the actual quality of films, I think the effect films like this one seem to consistently have on at least some section of the audience is valuable.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post #10 (Blog Assignment #12): Plans for Next Semester

Next semester, I’m taking FST 399 (Film Directing) and FST 318 (Screenwriting I) to explore some specific roles and interests of mine more in depth early on. Directing is a course I planned to take later on in my college career, but since directing is what I originally planned to do in the film industry, I decided that I wanted to take it earlier to make sure it was what I wanted. I chose to take Screenwriting as well to allow me to see another side of film I was interested in, in case directing waned, and because writing is a personal interest of mine, and I’d like to not only develop it further, but learn to write in script format. I also plan to volunteer for Visions, look into joining Flicker (if my schedule next semester will allow it!), and prepare and submit summer internship applications. Finally, I need to become engaged in research, possibly in both creative scholarship and the academic side of things.

Post #9 (Blog Assignment #10): Editing 3b (the Experimental Film)

For the experimental film, I was given the crew position of Sound. I was excited for it, though I didn’t have much experience in putting a soundtrack together, and just had fun collecting sounds, mixing them, and juxtaposing them (while staying within the theme). This editing process was different than video, which allows me to see in some sense what the product will be like as I’m editing. With sound, however, you can move things around, but you have to play it to get a sense for what it’s going to be. Furthermore, the experience of layering was far more prominent in sound than it would have been for me in video. Although in video you can do superimposition, with sound I was able to deal with layer upon layer (at the densest, I had 5 tracks playing at one time). Mixing natural sounds and mechanical ones was another interesting factor, since I combined collected and pre-recorded natural sounds with synthetic ones I created in Garageband.